Start / Politik (Archiv) / 2021050300

Die IHRA-Antisemitismus-Definition ist ein Betrug (III) [03.05.2021]

Nachdem wir am 3. April 2021 detailliert erklärt haben, warum wir die IHRA-Antisemitismus-Definition für einen politischen Betrug halten, erreichte uns nun eine Studie aus England, die den Schluss zulässt, dass der Betrug noch viel tiefer geht.

How the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism Is Being Misrepresented

by Jamie Stern-Weiner, PhD candidate, Wolfson College (Oxford)

Executive Summary

It has been claimed that the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, ‘including its 11 examples’, reflects an international consensus of antisemitism experts. This report, based on my doctoral research at the University of Oxford, exposes that claim as untrue:

1) There is no expert consensus supporting the Working Definition.
2) IHRA’s decision-making body, the Plenary, did not adopt any examples of ‘antisemitism’ as part of its Working Definition.
3) Senior IHRA officials and pro-Israel groups have misrepresented the IHRA Plenary’s decision in order to smuggle into the Working Definition examples that can be used to protect Israel from criticism.
4) These examples have been used, in practice, to censor Israel’s critics.

Die vollständige Arbeit finden Sie hier wieder.

 (ts)

Ergänzende Links:
How the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism Is Being Misrepresented
Reasons why no one should adopt the so-called “EUMC” or IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism (eccp)
Expert opinion on the “Working Definition of Antisemitism” of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (rlux)